Lin Shengliang
Journalism Evolution. 2025, 14(5): 58-66.
The core of computational advertising is algorithm communication, and the governance of privacy issues in computational advertising cannot be separated from the fundamental exploration of algorithm communication theory. This paper critically examines algorithm communication in the computational advertising from the perspectives of advertising reflection in accelerated social theory, consumption rediscussion of the information cocoon phenomenon, and the demystification of datadriven thinking. This paper also focuses on the inherent relationship between algorithm communication and embodied communication in computational advertising, revealing the paradox between the two: the more advanced the algorithm communication in computational advertising, the more profound the embodied consumption experience, and the more severe the algorithm alienation. Through theoretical speculation from the Frankfurt School, the Media Environment School, and the Empiricism School, the paper points out that the governance path of computational advertising privacy should strengthen the supervision of the monopoly of algorithm platforms, endow personal information with property rights to protect user rights, and balance the interests of multiple stakeholders through threelevel control before, during, and after the event.